Policy catalog
Documents the rules an organization intends agents to follow.
Governance vs execution authority
Governance organizes the rules and keeps the records. Execution authority returns a verdict before a consequential action runs and binds signed evidence to the effect.
Governance documents intent. Execution authority enforces it. Both want the same proof.
The category
A governance program sets policy for AI, tracks what is in use, and keeps the reports a review will ask for. This work matters. It tells an organization what it intends and gives auditors something to read.
Documents the rules an organization intends agents to follow.
Tracks which models, agents, and use cases are in scope.
Stores reports, attestations, and review history.
Maps activity to frameworks for auditors and stakeholders.
The difference
Governance can describe what an agent should do and still not stop a side effect that breaks the rule. Execution authority turns the policy into a decision at the moment the action is proposed, and signs evidence of what happened.
A consequential action
A governance record would note that exports of sensitive data need approval. HELM enforces it on the action and records the evidence.
Agent proposes
Agent proposes to export a customer list to an external destination
HELM checks policy
Checks data sensitivity, destination, and approval policy
Verdict
ESCALATE
Proof
Data-export receipt + approval EvidencePack
Questions
Governance is how an organization sets policy for AI, tracks what is in use, and keeps records for review. It organizes intent and produces reporting that maps activity to internal rules and external frameworks.
Governance organizes policy and records, often after the fact. Execution authority returns a verdict at the moment a consequential action is proposed, denies the unknown by default, and binds a signed receipt to the effect. One documents the rules; the other enforces them on each action and proves the outcome.
No. HELM checks a proposed action against policy before the effect runs and records receipts and EvidencePacks. Your governance program still owns policy, inventory, and review. HELM gives that program enforcement and evidence at the point of execution.
Frameworks like the NIST AI RMF describe outcomes such as mapping, measuring, and managing risk. HELM does not certify you against any framework. It produces the per-action verdicts and signed evidence that a governance program can reference when it reports against those frameworks.
Keep reading
Terms
A small bundle of records used to verify one event or review path.
Use for replayable evidence slices.A record chain that helps replay and check what happened.
Use for HELM proof records and replay paths.HELM lets the action run.
Use as a canonical verdict.HELM blocks the action.
Use as a canonical verdict.HELM stops and asks for more facts, policy, or human approval.
Use as the canonical non-dispatch path for missing facts, policy hold, or approval.Bring one consequential action to the boundary and see the verdict and the receipt.